Your LinkedIn connections with the authors
The case Bavulo Pty Limited v Zhang Property Pty Limited [2024] NSWSC 879, offers a comprehensive examination of the criteria for the validity of notices to complete within real estate transactions. The ruling provides valuable insights into the legal framework that governs the issue and enforcement of these notices.
Case Overview
In this matter, the vendor, Zhang Property Pty Limited, issued a notice to complete to the buyer, Bavulo Pty Limited, after Bavulo failed to settle the purchase by the agreed date. The buyer failed to comply with the notice and consequently the vendor terminated the contract and sought to retain the deposit. The buyer challenged the validity of both the notice to complete and the termination notice, contending that the vendor had breached the contract in the following ways:
Clause 24.4.3: Vendor did not provide a notice of attornment 2 business days before completion. Clauses 14.2 and 52.6: Vendor failed to provide documentation for rent adjustment.
Clause 52.7: Vendor did not notify the buyer of tenant breaches regarding late rent payments. Despite these breaches, the court concluded that they were insufficient to invalidate the notice to complete.
Legal Principles of Validity
A notice to complete must satisfy several legal conditions to be considered valid:
1. Compliance with Contractual Terms: The notice must strictly follow the provisions outlined in the contract, including the specified timeframe for performance and any particular procedures mandated by the agreement.
2. Good Faith: The issuer of the notice must act in good faith, ensuring that their actions do not undermine the contractual relationship or constitute an abuse of process.
3. Substantial Performance: The party issuing the notice must have substantially fulfilled their own contractual obligations. Minor breaches or non-critical deviations typically do not invalidate the notice.
Practical Implications
The ruling in Bavulo Pty Limited v Zhang Property Pty Limited underscores the critical importance of following contractual terms and acting in good faith when issuing notices to complete. Vendors must ensure their compliance with the contract and maintain transparency and fairness throughout the transaction process. Buyers should be aware that failing to adhere to a valid notice to complete can result in the termination of the contract and forfeiture of deposits. This case serves as a pertinent reminder of the legal standards governing notices to complete in real estate transactions. It highlights the necessity for parties to uphold their contractual obligations and engage in good faith practices. By doing so, they can mitigate risks and avoid protracted legal disputes. For a detailed review of the judgment, please visit the NSW Caselaw website.